okay gets, essentially, if it were , then it would be the second, but since it is the (aka the Derivative of per ) it would be the rate of change, not the current rate of increase of subscribers.
the way i understand it, it follows Velocity and Acceleration logic, where derivatives are the acceleration, the way your is changing, integrals are the *net change of .
Expression | What It Represents | Analogy |
---|---|---|
Current rate of subscriber gain (e.g., 100 subs/month) | Velocity | |
How fast that rate is changing (e.g., +3 subs/month²) | Acceleration | |
Net change in number of subscribers over time | Total distance traveled | |
Net change in the rate of subscriber gain | Change in velocity |